§UK regular pay growth first-print forecast
Framing and exact resolver: the target is ONS series KAI9, AWE whole economy year-on-year three-month average growth (%), seasonally adjusted regular pay excluding arrears, value for 2026 JUL. The official ONS UK Labour Market: September 2026 page verifies the release date as 15 September 2026 at 7:00am; I use the first KAI9 print and ignore later revisions.
Variant discipline: all anchors below are from the same KAI9 variant named in the resolver: regular pay excluding arrears, seasonally adjusted, whole economy, year-on-year three-month average growth in percent.
ONS KAI9 time-series page, latest observed target-variant prints↳ Fetched KAI9 recent values: 2026 JAN 3.8, 2026 FEB 3.6, 2026 MAR 3.4, 2026 APR 3.4, 2026 MAY 3.4, 2026 JUN 3.5 percent.ONS KAI9 time-series page, prior six monthly prints for the same variant↳ Fetched KAI9 prior values: 2025 JUL 4.8, 2025 AUG 4.7, 2025 SEP 4.7, 2025 OCT 4.6, 2025 NOV 4.4, 2025 DEC 4.1 percent.ONS KAI9 metadata and ONS September 2026 labour-market release page↳ Fetched metadata and schedule: KAI9 release date 18 August 2026, next release 15 September 2026, latest observed KAI9 value 2026 JUN 3.5, and UK Labour Market: September 2026 release time 7:00am.Base rate/reference class: the 12 fetched KAI9 prints from 2025 JUL through 2026 JUN average 4.03 percent, but the last six average 3.52 percent and the last four sit at 3.4, 3.4, 3.4, and 3.5, so persistence around 3.5 is the base rate for a one-month-ahead three-month-average target.
Prior/update/interval: persistence prior is latest KAI9 = 3.5 using the historical sample 2025 JUL-2026 JUN. Level adjustment is 0.0 because the latest six-print mean is 3.52 and the latest print is 3.5; momentum adjustment is 0.0 because the series flattened at 3.4-3.5; one-off adjustment is 0.0 because public-sector pay-award support is offset by private-sector cooling; policy-mechanism adjustment is 0.0 because this is a labour-market survey print, not a policy decision. For one-month-ahead uncertainty I use realized monthly changes in the fetched KAI9 prints: [-0.1, 0.0, -0.1, -0.2, -0.3, -0.3, -0.2, -0.2, 0.0, 0.0, 0.1], giving sigma = 0.133 and 1.28*sigma = 0.170. I widen to a 0.4 point half-width because the short realized-change sample is a smooth disinflation plateau and the next three-month average replaces one component month with July; rounded to one decimal, the 80% interval is 3.1 to 3.9.
Upside risk: a stronger July single-month pay reading, renewed public-sector award effects, or composition shifts toward higher-paid employment would land above the interval if they push KAI9 above 3.9. Downside risk: sharper private-sector wage cooling, weaker paid-hours composition, or survey reweighting would land below the interval if they push KAI9 below 3.1. Outside the interval would require a break from the recent 3.4-3.5 plateau rather than ordinary month-to-month noise.
Review disposition: accepted the interval critique by switching the uncertainty arithmetic from level dispersion to realized monthly changes and narrowing the interval; accepted the suggestion to make the one-off adjustment a single 0.0 value and kept source context focused on the exact KAI9 and September 2026 ONS pages.