Government data

US nonfarm unit labor costs Q3 2026 prelim

What will BLS report as the first-print seasonally adjusted annualized quarter-over-quarter percent change in nonfarm business sector unit labor costs for 2026 Q3?

Forecast

+2.4%
-0.3%–+5.1%
80% prediction interval
gpt-5.5Run record ↗

Cumulative probability

Chance that the outcome is at or below each value.

0%25%50%75%100%-4.3%+2.4%+9.2%Forecast value

Shaded band: 80% interval (-0.3%–+5.1%). Dashed line: point estimate (+2.4%).

Derived from the point estimate and 80% interval; the agent did not report a full distribution.

Analysis

§US nonfarm business unit labor costs, 2026 Q3 preliminary

Framing and exact resolver: this is the BLS Productivity and Costs nonfarm business sector unit labor costs series, quarterly percent change from the previous quarter at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate, first print for 2026 Q3. The release and all historical anchors below use the same preliminary-release variant rather than revised database values.

Resolver alignment: the official statistical release is the BLS Productivity and Costs preliminary release, while the canonical ledger sourceBinding resolves through ALFRED/FRED series PRS85006112 with releasePolicy first_print. I keep the canonical slug and dataPointId and set the resolution URL to the ledger ALFRED series while naming the underlying BLS release in the rule.

▸ Reported tool use: official.lookupmodel report
Checked the BLS Productivity Program schedule of releases and revisions for Productivity and Costs.
↳ BLS lists initial release of Second Quarter 2026 data on August 6, 2026, revision of Second Quarter 2026 data on September 3, 2026, initial release of Third Quarter 2026 data on November 5, 2026, and revision of Third Quarter 2026 data on December 8, 2026.
▸ Reported tool use: official.lookupmodel report
Read BLS archived preliminary Productivity and Costs releases for recent nonfarm business unit labor cost first prints.
↳ Fetched first-print nonfarm business unit labor costs: 2026-Q1 was 2.3 percent, 2025-Q4 was 2.8 percent, and 2025-Q3 was -1.9 percent, all SAAR percent changes from previous quarter.
▸ Reported tool use: official.lookupmodel report
Read additional BLS archived preliminary Productivity and Costs releases to build the reference class.
↳ Fetched first-print nonfarm business unit labor costs: 2025-Q2 was 1.6 percent, 2025-Q1 was 5.7 percent, 2024-Q4 was 3.0 percent, 2024-Q3 was 1.9 percent, and 2024-Q2 was 0.9 percent, all SAAR percent changes from previous quarter.

The base rate/reference class is the eight most recent available same-variant preliminary nonfarm business ULC prints: 0.9, 1.9, 3.0, 5.7, 1.6, -1.9, 2.8, and 2.3 percent. Their mean is 2.04 percent; persistence from 2026-Q1 is 2.3 percent, so both point to a low-to-mid 2 percent forecast before current-quarter specifics.

Prior/update/interval: persistence prior = 2.3 from the latest same-variant 2026-Q1 preliminary print; historical sample = the eight preliminary prints from 2024-Q2 through 2026-Q1 with mean 2.04. Adjustment components: +0.2 for compensation growth staying positive, +0.1 for uncertainty before the not-yet-released Q2 productivity print, and -0.2 for the tendency of stronger productivity to offset hourly compensation in this series, giving point = 2.4. For a change/flow series, sigma is computed from the values themselves: sample standard deviation of [0.9, 1.9, 3.0, 5.7, 1.6, -1.9, 2.8, 2.3] gives sigma = 2.14. The 80 percent normal half-width is 1.28*sigma = 1.28*2.14 = 2.74, rounded to 2.7, so bounds are 2.4 - 2.7 = -0.3 and 2.4 + 2.7 = 5.1.

Eight same-variant first prints are a short but clean reference class; using a longer revised database history would mix vintages and understate the exact first-print target noise. The interval is therefore tied to preliminary-print dispersion, and revision-prone tails remain the main residual risk.

Upside risk is a quarter with compensation growth near recent highs and weak productivity, which would land above the interval if ULC exceeds 5.1 percent. Downside risk is another productivity surge like 2025-Q3, which would push ULC below zero; a very large productivity surprise with subdued compensation would land below the interval.

Review disposition: accepted the resolver critique by aligning resolutionSourceUrl and rule with the canonical ALFRED PRS85006112 first-print binding while preserving BLS as the underlying official release; accepted the optional clarification on short same-variant volatility and first-print tail risk.

Key drivers

  • Recent first-print nonfarm ULC values average about 2.0 percent SAAR
  • Compensation growth remains the positive level anchor for ULC
  • Productivity gains can quickly push ULC below trend
  • First-print Q3 uses the preliminary BLS Productivity and Costs variant, with canonical resolution through ALFRED PRS85006112 first vintage

Tool evidence

This run has no captured tool responses. “Reported tool use” in the analysis is the model’s account, not an archived tool response.

Sources and resolution

Official source
ALFRED/FRED first-vintage mirror of the BLS Productivity and Costs nonfarm business unit labor costs series PRS85006112
Resolution date
November 5, 2026· outcome not recorded
Resolution rule
Resolve to the first-print value for BLS series PRS85006112, nonfarm business sector unit labor costs, percent change from previous quarter at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate, for 2026 Q3 as captured by the canonical ALFRED first-vintage source binding. This corresponds to the BLS Productivity and Costs: Third Quarter 2026, Preliminary release scheduled for November 5, 2026. Use the value rounded to one decimal place as published in that first release or first ALFRED vintage; ignore later revised releases and database revisions.
Run details

The analysis is the model’s written report. Tool-use descriptions in that report are model claims; the activity artifacts contain the execution record.

thesis.analyst · gpt-5.5 · fast · v2.4.0

pre-submit review · completed

Draft is mostly coherent, but it should reconcile the published resolver fields with the canonical ledger source binding before publication.

  • blocking resolver: The draft resolver names the BLS news release URL, while the canonical ledger sourceBinding specifies the ALFRED/FRED PRS85006112 first-print source URL and allowed host.
  • info optional_suggestion: Clarify why the eight-print sample is sufficient for volatility rather than using a longer same-variant preliminary history.
  • info optional_suggestion: The interval math is acceptable, but note that ULC is often revision-prone and first-print noise may widen tails.

disposition accepted: Review disposition: accepted the resolver critique by aligning resolutionSourceUrl and rule with the canonical ALFRED PRS85006112 first-print binding while preserving BLS as the underlying official release; accepted the optional clarification on short same-variant volatility and first-print tail risk.

disposition not applicable: Review disposition: accepted the resolver critique by aligning resolutionSourceUrl and rule with the canonical ALFRED PRS85006112 first-print binding while preserving BLS as the underlying official release; accepted the optional clarification on short same-variant volatility and first-print tail risk.

disposition not applicable: Review disposition: accepted the resolver critique by aligning resolutionSourceUrl and rule with the canonical ALFRED PRS85006112 first-print binding while preserving BLS as the underlying official release; accepted the optional clarification on short same-variant volatility and first-print tail risk.

Activity artifacts

Complete original trace

§US nonfarm business unit labor costs, 2026 Q3 preliminary

Framing and exact resolver: this is the BLS Productivity and Costs nonfarm business sector unit labor costs series, quarterly percent change from the previous quarter at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate, first print for 2026 Q3. The release and all historical anchors below use the same preliminary-release variant rather than revised database values.

Resolver alignment: the official statistical release is the BLS Productivity and Costs preliminary release, while the canonical ledger sourceBinding resolves through ALFRED/FRED series PRS85006112 with releasePolicy first_print. I keep the canonical slug and dataPointId and set the resolution URL to the ledger ALFRED series while naming the underlying BLS release in the rule.

▸ Reported tool use: official.lookupmodel report
Checked the BLS Productivity Program schedule of releases and revisions for Productivity and Costs.
↳ BLS lists initial release of Second Quarter 2026 data on August 6, 2026, revision of Second Quarter 2026 data on September 3, 2026, initial release of Third Quarter 2026 data on November 5, 2026, and revision of Third Quarter 2026 data on December 8, 2026.
▸ Reported tool use: official.lookupmodel report
Read BLS archived preliminary Productivity and Costs releases for recent nonfarm business unit labor cost first prints.
↳ Fetched first-print nonfarm business unit labor costs: 2026-Q1 was 2.3 percent, 2025-Q4 was 2.8 percent, and 2025-Q3 was -1.9 percent, all SAAR percent changes from previous quarter.
▸ Reported tool use: official.lookupmodel report
Read additional BLS archived preliminary Productivity and Costs releases to build the reference class.
↳ Fetched first-print nonfarm business unit labor costs: 2025-Q2 was 1.6 percent, 2025-Q1 was 5.7 percent, 2024-Q4 was 3.0 percent, 2024-Q3 was 1.9 percent, and 2024-Q2 was 0.9 percent, all SAAR percent changes from previous quarter.

The base rate/reference class is the eight most recent available same-variant preliminary nonfarm business ULC prints: 0.9, 1.9, 3.0, 5.7, 1.6, -1.9, 2.8, and 2.3 percent. Their mean is 2.04 percent; persistence from 2026-Q1 is 2.3 percent, so both point to a low-to-mid 2 percent forecast before current-quarter specifics.

Prior/update/interval: persistence prior = 2.3 from the latest same-variant 2026-Q1 preliminary print; historical sample = the eight preliminary prints from 2024-Q2 through 2026-Q1 with mean 2.04. Adjustment components: +0.2 for compensation growth staying positive, +0.1 for uncertainty before the not-yet-released Q2 productivity print, and -0.2 for the tendency of stronger productivity to offset hourly compensation in this series, giving point = 2.4. For a change/flow series, sigma is computed from the values themselves: sample standard deviation of [0.9, 1.9, 3.0, 5.7, 1.6, -1.9, 2.8, 2.3] gives sigma = 2.14. The 80 percent normal half-width is 1.28*sigma = 1.28*2.14 = 2.74, rounded to 2.7, so bounds are 2.4 - 2.7 = -0.3 and 2.4 + 2.7 = 5.1.

Eight same-variant first prints are a short but clean reference class; using a longer revised database history would mix vintages and understate the exact first-print target noise. The interval is therefore tied to preliminary-print dispersion, and revision-prone tails remain the main residual risk.

Upside risk is a quarter with compensation growth near recent highs and weak productivity, which would land above the interval if ULC exceeds 5.1 percent. Downside risk is another productivity surge like 2025-Q3, which would push ULC below zero; a very large productivity surprise with subdued compensation would land below the interval.

Review disposition: accepted the resolver critique by aligning resolutionSourceUrl and rule with the canonical ALFRED PRS85006112 first-print binding while preserving BLS as the underlying official release; accepted the optional clarification on short same-variant volatility and first-print tail risk.

calibrated forecast · 80% CI
+2.4%[-0.3% · +5.1%]
Target metadata

Data point: bls.productivity.nonfarm_unit_labor_costs_qoq_prelim.2026_q3.first_print

More government data forecasts